Ita/108/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.a.p.vinu
High Court
22 Sep 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/108/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.a.p.vinu
Date of order
22 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/108/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.a.p.vinu, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
WEDNESDAY, THE 22 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 31ST BHADRA, 1943
ITA NO. 18 OF 2011
AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 383/2007 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH,ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II COCHIN
BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/S:
SRI.A.P.VINU, ALUKKAS JEWELLERY,M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-11
BY ADV SRI.A.KUMAR
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 22.09.2021,ALONG WITH ITA.108/2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
ITA Nos.18/2011 & 108/2013
-2-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
WEDNESDAY, THE 22 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 31ST BHADRA, 1943
ITA NO. 108 OF 2013
AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 313/2011 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH,
ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, COCHIN
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/S:
SRI.A.P.VINU, ALUKKAS JEWELLERY,M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-11
BY ADV SRI.A.KUMAR
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 22.09.2021,ALONG WITH ITA.18/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
[ITA Nos.18/2011, 108/2013]
S.V. Bhatti, J.
Appeals are at the instance of Revenue. The orders dated
05.08.2010 and 10.08.2012 in I.T.A. No.383/Coch/2007 and I.T.A.
No.313/Coch/2011 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Cochin Bench, Cochin, are assailed.
2.Advocate Mr A Kumar, on instructions received from
the assessee, informs the Court that the assessee has availed theoption to settle the dispute under 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme.
3.The Income Tax Appeals are dismissed as ineffective,
for, the assessee, during the pendency of the appeals, has opted
for the benefit provided under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme.
ITA Nos.18/2011 & 108/2013
The assessee/Revenue, as the case may be, is given liberty
to file petition to recall the instant order in the event of nottaking the request of the assessee to its logical end under theScheme.
Sd/-S.V.BHATTIJUDGESd/-VIJU ABRAHAMJUDGE
jjj
ITA Nos.18/2011 & 108/2013
APPENDIX OF ITA 108/2013
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE A:TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 27/12/2006 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2004-05.27/12/2006 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2004-05.
ANNEXURE B:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) DATED 15/01/2006.INCOME TAX (APPEALS) DATED 15/01/2006.
ANNEXURE C:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO. 383/COCH/2007 DATED 30/03/2009.APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO. 383/COCH/2007 DATED 30/03/2009.
ANNEXURE D:TRUE COPY OF THE PENALTY DATED 20/08/2009.ANNEXURE E:TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 5/10/2009 IN ITA 1690/2009.ANNEXURE E:TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 5/10/2009 IN ITA 1690/2009.
ANNEXURE F:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18/02/2010 IN RP NO. 23/2010 IN ITA 1690/2009.23/2010 IN ITA 1690/2009.
ANNEXURE G:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 14/07/2010 IN ITA 383/COCH/2007.14/07/2010 IN ITA 383/COCH/2007.
ANNEXURE H:TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) DATED 12/01/2011TAX(APPEALS) DATED 12/01/2011
ANNEXURE I:CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 14/07/2010 IN ITA 313/COCH/2011 DATED 10/08/2012 WITH A COPY.DATED 14/07/2010 IN ITA 313/COCH/2011 DATED 10/08/2012 WITH A COPY.
ITA Nos.18/2011 & 108/2013
APPENDIX OF ITA 18/2011
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE A:COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S 143(3) DATED 27/12/2006 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05.27/12/2006 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05.
ANNEXURE B:COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15/01/2006 OF THE CIT(APPEALS).CIT(APPEALS).
ANNEXURE C:COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30/03/2009 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
ANNEXURE H:TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) DATED 12/01/2011TAX(APPEALS) DATED 12/01/2011
ANNEXURE I:CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 14/07/2010 IN ITA 313/COCH/2011 DATED 10/08/2012 WITH A COPY.DATED 14/07/2010 IN ITA 313/COCH/2011 DATED 10/08/2012 WITH A COPY.
ITA Nos.18/2011 & 108/2013
APPENDIX OF ITA 18/2011
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE A:COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S 143(3) DATED 27/12/2006 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05.27/12/2006 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05.
ANNEXURE B:COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15/01/2006 OF THE CIT(APPEALS).CIT(APPEALS).
ANNEXURE C:COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30/03/2009 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
ANNEXURE D:COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT DATED 5/10/2009.DATED 5/10/2009.
ANNEXURE E:COPY OF THE REVIEW PETITION FILED BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT.HON'BLE HIGH COURT.
ANNEXURE F:COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18/02/2010 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT ON THE REVIEW PETITION FILED.HON'BLE HIGH COURT ON THE REVIEW PETITION FILED.
ANNEXURE G:COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 8/7/2010 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
ANNEXURE H:CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14/07/2010 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ON THE MISC. PETITION FILED.THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ON THE MISC. PETITION FILED.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.