Case LawHigh Court › Ita/108/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/108/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemptions) v. Shri Kshatriya Ghanchi Samaj Sanghatana

High Court 01 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/108/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemptions) v. Shri Kshatriya Ghanchi Samaj Sanghatana
Date of order
01 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/108/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemptions) v. Shri Kshatriya Ghanchi Samaj Sanghatana, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATEBD THIS THE DAY OF JULY, 2010. PRESENT THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.SRBBNIVASKH GOWDA ITA NO.108/2016 BETWERE THR COMMISSIONBR OF |INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS)MANGALORE. _. APPELLANT (By SRI. E. I. SANMATHI, ADV.) AND: SHRI. KSHATRIYA GHANCHLSAMAJ SANGHATANA,BHATI HOUSE,#2212/B, KODIBAG KARWAR,UTTARKANNADA —- 581 3038PAN NO:AAMTS7180OD. ... RESPONDENT (NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O RESPONDENT), 2 THIS [TA IS FILED UNDER SEKC.260-A OF [INCOMTAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED)10/06/2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.100/PNJ/2014 PRAYINGTO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR|SUCH|OTHERQUESTIONS.OF|LAWASMAYBE.FORMULATED BY THR HON’BLE COURT AS DEBMBED FITANDSETASIDETHE.APPBRLLATEORDERDATED10.06.2015 PASSED BY THE ITAT, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI,AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE’S|CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN ITA NO.100/PNJ/2014& GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE)INTRBREST OF JUSTICE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,JAYANT PATEL J.,PASSHBTHE FOLLOWING: ORDER sri. E.I. Sanmathi, learned counsel for theappellant-Revenue states that the matter is covered bythe decision of this Court in the case of Meenaksh]|Amma Endowment Trust in ITA No.192/2010 dated10.11.2010.. oD Under the circumstances, we do not findthat any substantial questions of law would arise. � �94;9��679�@19>946�3@@938�2>�:2>52>>9:��� ���%,� ����������� ������������
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan