Case Law › High Court › Ita/108/2017 Of Pradeep Ku.prusty v. Inc...

Ita/108/2017 Of Pradeep Ku.prusty v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-11

High Court 10 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

10 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/108/2017 Of Pradeep Ku.prusty v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-11, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Order No. 04. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK I.T.A. No.108 of 2017 Mr. Pradeep Kumar Prusty …. Appellant Mr. B. Panda, Advocate -versus- …. Respondent The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Bhubaneswar and another Mr. T.K. Satpathy, Sr. Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK ORDER 10.03.2022 1. Learned counsel for the Appellant does not want to press this appeal. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge KC Bisoi

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.