Ita/1088/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M.k.chandramohan Das, Kochi
High Court
11 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1088/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M.k.chandramohan Das, Kochi
Date of order
11 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1088/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M.k.chandramohan Das, Kochi, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
TUESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2009 / 20TH SRAVANA 1931
ITA.No. 1088 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.1272/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT:
------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT:
--------------------------
M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS,
PROP: DAS & ASSOCIATES, AMBADI LANE,
CHITTOR ROAD, COCHIN-11.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 11/08/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.1088 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 11th day of August, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since the question raised pertains to unexplained investment andsince both the appellate authorities found that the transactions aregenuine and stand proved, we do not find any substantial question oflaw arising from the order of the Tribunal. Appeal is consequentlydismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue