Case LawHigh Court › Ita/109/2017 Of M/S. Shushrutha v. The A...

Ita/109/2017 Of M/S. Shushrutha v. The Assistant Director Of Income-Tax

High Court 16 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/109/2017 Of M/S. Shushrutha v. The Assistant Director Of Income-Tax
Date of order
16 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/109/2017 Of M/S. Shushrutha v. The Assistant Director Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16[TH|]DAY OF JANUARY 2071PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’‘’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW A 1LT.A. NO.109 OF 2017BETWEEN: M/S. SHUSHRUTHA|EDUCATIONAL TRUST.REP. BY ITS SECRETARY|DR, L.V.G. NARGUND|NO.2366/27, GURUKRUPA™12TH MAIN, A BLOCK, 2ND STAGERAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010. (BY MR. CHANDRASHEKAR V, ADV.,MR. M. LAVA, ADV.,) .... APPELLAN/ AND" THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE 17(2)6TH FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING ANNEXEP. KALINGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560027. (BY MR. DILIP KUMAR, ADV., FORMR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) | .., RESPONDENT THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX|ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30.09.2016 PASSEDIN CROSS OBJECTION NOS.80 TO 83/BANG/2012 ARISING OUT.OF ITA NO.418 TO 421/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR-2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 AND 2007-08 DATED 30.09.2016(ANNEXURE-A) PRAYING TO(i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS.STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE.APPELLANT. (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE,APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT IN CROSS.OBJECTION NOS.80 TO 83/BANG/2012 ARISING OUT OF ITANO.418 TO 421/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2004-O5,2005-06,|2006-07AND|200 /-08DATED30.09.2016(ANNEXURE-A).(iil) PASS SUCH ORDERS, AS THIS HON BLE COURT DEEMS|FIT AND PROPER TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Mr.V.Chandrashekar, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind,|jearned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for tne assessee nas filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal with|liberty to revive the same if occasion so arises. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/-—JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan