Ita/110/2009 Of M/S. Tata Coffee Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
06 Nov 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/110/2009 Of M/S. Tata Coffee Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/110/2009 Of M/S. Tata Coffee Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.| Sd/-)JUDGE Sd/-|JUDGE
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 06 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SREEDHAR RAO|
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO
INCOME-TAX APPEAL NO.110/2009|
BRTWREB
M/S. TATA COFFEE LIMITED
FORMBLY KNOWN AS CONSOLIDATED COFFE LID. POLLIBETTA, COORG- 571 215
_. APPKELLANT
(BY SRI.K S RAMABHADRAN, ADV.)
ANT
THER ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF|
INCOME TAX CIRCLE 12(3).
BANGALORE
—. RBSPONDBENT
(BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
THIS ITA FILED U/S.260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISINGOUT OF ORDER DATED 31/10/2008 PASSED IN ITA NO.|422/BNG/2008, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003-2004,PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLEKE COURT MAY BR PLBASETO:
I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED THEREIN,
Il ALLOW THR APPEAL AND SEHT ASIDE THE ORDER
PASSED.BY|THERITATBANGALORE,IN-ITA|NO.|422/BNG/2008,DATED 31/10/2008 IN THE INTEREST OFJUSTICE.
THIS [TA IS COMING ON FOR FINAL HBARING THIS)DAY,SREEDHAR RAO J.,5 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JU DGMENT
This Court in ITA Nos.1092/2006, 507/2006 and396/2007 in respect of the same assessee for thedifferent assessment years has set aside the order of theTribunal and remanded the matters to the AssessingOfficer for fresh assessment. Even in this case also,similar questions of law arise. Hence, the order of theTribunal is set aside and the matter is remanded to theAssessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordancewith law. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.|
Sd/-)JUDGE
Sd/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.