Case Law › High Court › Ita/111/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/111/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangabad v. M/S Mainadevi Saklecha Developers, Jalna

High Court 05 Dec 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

05 Dec 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/111/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangabad v. M/S Mainadevi Saklecha Developers, Jalna, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3]In view of the statement of Mr.Sharma, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.111 OF 2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AURANGABADVERSUS M/S. MAINADEVI SAKLECHA DEVELOPERS, JALNA ... Standing Counsel for Appellant : Mr.Alok Sharma Advocate for Respondents : Mr.A B Kale For R/sole. … CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & MANGESH S. PATIL,JJ. DATE : 05/12/2018 PER COURT :- Heard Mr.Alok Sharma, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant. 2]Mr.Sharma, learned counsel on instructions received by him submitted that in view of Circular No.3/2018 dated 11/7/2018 and the tax liability involved in the matter being below Rs.50 lakhs the appellant be permitted to withdraw this appeal. 3]In view of the statement of Mr.Sharma, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. (MANGESH S. PATIL,J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.