Case LawHigh Court › Ita/111/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/111/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. M/S Pavagada Souharda Multipurpose Co-Op Ltd

High Court 28 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/111/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. M/S Pavagada Souharda Multipurpose Co-Op Ltd
Date of order
28 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
2012-2013
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/111/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. M/S Pavagada Souharda Multipurpose Co-Op Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Issue: The learned counsel submitsthat at the present stage it may not be possible for him tosubmit whether the matter falls under any of the exceptions. |Tnerefore, it is prayed that liberty may be reserved to theappellants to move this Court, if it is found that the matter fallswithin the exception carve...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS| INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.111/2018 BETWEEN: 1.PR, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 6)BMTC COMPLEXBMTC COMPLEX KORMANGALA, BANGALORE _ 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 6 (3) (2),BENGALURU_.. APPELLANTS (BY SRI.E.R.INDRAKUMAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FORE.I.LSANMATHI, ADV.) AND= M/S.PAVAGADA SOUHARDA MULTIPURPOSE CO-OP LTD., |NO.2729, 14 CROSSE-BLOCK, KODIGEHALLI GATE,SAHAKARANAGAR|BENGALURU —- 560 O92PAN: AAAAT 7/73/... RESPONDENT (BY SRI.M.JAIPRAKASH REDDY, ADV. ) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT.1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED:22.09.2017 PASSED INITA NO. 34/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR:2012-2013, PRAYING 70O:(1) DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OFLAW AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BEFORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SETASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED:227.09.201/7 PASSED BTHE|INCOMETAXAPPELLATETRIBUNAL,"B'BENCH,BANGALORE, AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT -ASSESSEE SCASE,IN|APPEAL|PROCEEDINGS|IN|ITANO.34/BANG/2017 FOR A.Y.2012-2013 & GRANT SUCH OTHERRELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,|DEVDASJ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue brings totne notice of this Court a Circular bearing No.1/7 of 2019 datedO8[<0]August, 2019 wherein the further enhancement of monetary|limit for filing of appeals by the Departments before the Income-Tax Appeliate Tribunals, High Courts and Special LeavePetitions/Appeals before the Supreme Court stands amended,and by the said amendment the earlier monetary limit ofRs.50,00,000/- (Rupees fifty lakh) has not been raised toRs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees one crore). The earlier monetary limitwas prescribed as per Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[<0]July, 2018. In the light of the same, the learned counsel submits thatthe appeal is not maintainable and in view of tne Circular, theappeal may be permitted to be withdrawn. Further, the learnedcounsel would aliso draw the attention of tnis Court to Clause 10of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[<0]July, 2018 wherein|certain exceptions are carved out. The learned counsel submitsthat at the present stage it may not be possible for him tosubmit whether the matter falls under any of the exceptions. |Tnerefore, it is prayed that liberty may be reserved to theappellants to move this Court, if it is found that the matter fallswithin the exception carved out in Clause 10 of Circular bearingNumber 3 of 2018. 2. On the query of the Court as to whether the Circular is |applicable to pending matters, the learned counsel draws theattention of this Court to the communication dated 20[<0]AUGUST,2019 made by the Central Board of Direct Taxation to all theChief Commissioners of Income Tax clarifying at paragrapn No.3that the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.17 of 2019 is applicable to all pending Special Leave Petitions, Appeals, CrossObjections and References.| 3. In view of the above, we permit the appellant towithdraw tne appeal for the reasons stated above. Liberty isalso granted to the appellant to seek revival of this appeal, if it isfound tnat the matter falls within the exception carved out inClause 10 of Circular bearing No.3 of 2018. lnn Sd/-JUDGESd/-JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan