Ita/1112/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thrissur v. M/S. Gold Plaza India (P) Ltd
High Court
30 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1112/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thrissur v. M/S. Gold Plaza India (P) Ltd
Date of order
30 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1112/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thrissur v. M/S. Gold Plaza India (P) Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
& THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 8TH ASWINA 1931
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
ITA.No. 1112 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.649/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------
M/S.GOLD PLAZA INDIA PVT.LTD.,CEE PEE
TOWERS,P.O.ROAD,THRISSUR.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 30/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 1112 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 30th day of September, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Standing counsel submitted that order appealed against is recalledby the Tribunal and fresh order is issued against which also thedepartment has grievance. Even though he has prayed for substitutionof the present order for the old one, we do not think that is the correctprocedure. We therefore grant permission to the department towithdraw the appeal and file fresh appeal if they so desire against theorder later issued by the Tribunal. Consequently the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn leaving freedom to the department to claimeligible court fee and file appeal against the later order issued by theTribunal, if so desired.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(V.K. MOHANAN)
Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.