In Ita/11/2006 Of Deputy Comm.of Income Tax Raipur v. Smt.rajkumari Bahal, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
:s'Na^K:i%sll^BS81'^'SSgjWTHE®IG®COlIRTOrJUDIGAI'l]REGBHATSSGARH's>ATfilLASPUR^iCJillfil5,f<'-***-K<^..-'%'.1^-[yIncomeTaxAppealNp. f//2006^^.^yyv>|Appellant><DepulyConimissionerQf^^I^CiFclel (l)Raipur.sspondentit. Rajkumari Bahal PrQp.S.P. Iraders,^ NewBpmbayMarket.Raipur.^IncomeTaxappealu/s^fiflAoflricUmBTax.Alst^^M;^i:
rHC—78
%..T^ "iWWi, •S^WW. [^'^W'ir^:.Z~7:^;.A/o.....«/o6..
KSFSSKT'W^^S^^'esiFVfVf^^
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.