Ita/11/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Arshia Basith
High Court
28 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/11/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Arshia Basith
Date of order
28 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/11/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Arshia Basith, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Issue: Tne learned counsel submitsthat at the present stage it may not be possible for him toSubmit whether the matter falls under any of the exceptions. |Therefore, it is prayed that liberty may be reserved to theappellants to move this Court, if it is found that the matter fallswithin the exception carve...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28 DAY OF AUGUST, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY
AND
THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS|
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.11/2019
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.INTERTNATIONAL TAXKATION# FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.8O FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 O95
2 |THE INCOME TAX OFFICER |INTERNATIONAL TAXATIONWARD-1(1), 4 FLOORBMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD|KORMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095 _
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND & SRI DILIP M., ADVS.)
AND:
SMT ARSHIA BASITHQQ027-A BLOCSALARPURIA SILVER WOODSRAHATH BAGH, OLD MADRAS ROAD|BENGALURU-560 093PAN: AARPB 6061B.. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI SUDHEENDRA B.R., ADV.)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION JZ60-A OF INCOME TAX ACT1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED:14/08/2018 PASSED IN.IT(IT)A NO.2768/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 PRAYING TQ: 1. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF|LAW STATED ABOVE. 2. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE!ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,|BENGALURU IN ITQCIT)A NO. 2768/BANG/2017 DATED:14/08/2018 FORASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-20L5 ANNEXURE-C CONFIRMING THE!ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE!ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL|TAXATION, WARD-1(1), BENGALURU.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,DEVDAS J*T7DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Tne learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue brings to.the notice of this Court a Circular bearing No.17 of 2019 datedO8[:.]August, 2019 wherein the further ennancement of monetary|limit for filing of appeals by the Departments before the Income-Tax Appeliate Tribunals, High Courts and Special LeavePetitions/Appeals before the Supreme Court stands amended,and py tne said amendment the earlier monetary limit ofRs.50,00,000/- (Rupees fifty lakh) has not been raised toRs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees one crore). The earlier monetary limitwas prescribed as per Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[:.]July,2018. In the light of the same, the learned counsel submits that|tne appeal is not maintainable and in view of the Circular, the|
appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn. Further, the learnedcounsel would aliso draw the attention of tnis Court to Clause 10of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[:.]July, 2018 wherein|certain exceptions are carved out. Tne learned counsel submitsthat at the present stage it may not be possible for him toSubmit whether the matter falls under any of the exceptions. |Therefore, it is prayed that liberty may be reserved to theappellants to move this Court, if it is found that the matter fallswithin the exception carved out in Clause 10 of Circular bearingNumber 3 of 2018.
2. On the query of the Court as to wnether the Circular is |applicable to pending matters, the learned counsel draws theattention of this Court to the communication dated 20[:.]AUGUST,2019 made by the Central Board of Direct Taxation to all theChief Commissioners of Income Tax clarifying at paragrapn No.3that the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.17 of 2019 isapplicable to all pending Special Leave Petitions, Appeals, CrossObjections and References.
3. In view of the above, we permit the appellant towithdraw tne appeal for the reasons stated above. Liberty isalso granted to the appellant to seek revival of this appeal, if it isfound tnat the matter falls within the exception carved out inClause 10 of Circular bearing No.3 of 2018.
inn.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.