Case LawHigh Court › Ita/112/1999 Of The Comm Of Income Tax v...

Ita/112/1999 Of The Comm Of Income Tax v. Ramgopal G. Dujodwala (Huf)

High Court 06 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/112/1999 Of The Comm Of Income Tax v. Ramgopal G. Dujodwala (Huf)
Date of order
06 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/112/1999 Of The Comm Of Income Tax v. Ramgopal G. Dujodwala (Huf), the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Issue: P.C.:- P.C.:- The above applications were admitted on the following substantial question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in law in deleting the penalty levied u/s.271(1) (c) of the I.T.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.112 OF 1999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.112 OF 1999 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Petitioner. V/s. Ramgopal O.Dujodwala (HUF) ..Respondent. WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.114 OF 1999 INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.114 OF 1999 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Petitioner. V/s. Omprakash Vineet Dujodwala (HUF) ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for petitioner in both the applications. Ms.Beena Pillai i/b. D.M.Harish & Co. for respondent in both the applications. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- The above applications were admitted on the following substantial question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in law in deleting the penalty levied u/s.271(1) (c) of the I.T. Act, in each of the above cases " ? - = : 2 : = - 2. The above applications are pertaining to the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81. 3. Two Applications were disposed of pertaining to the Kamalkumar R. Dujodwala (HUF) and Ramgopal G. Dujodwala (HUF) being Income Tax Application Nos.111 of 1999 and No.113 of 1999 vide our order dated 5th March, 2007. 4. For the reasons stated in the said order, Rule stands discharged. 5. Both the applications stand disposed of. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan