Ita/112/2019 Of Paul Vadakkumcherry v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
21 Feb 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/112/2019 Of Paul Vadakkumcherry v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
21 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/112/2019 Of Paul Vadakkumcherry v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
MONDAY, THE 21 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 2ND PHALGUNA, 1943
ITA NO. 112 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 129/2016 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCHAPPELLANT/S:
PAUL VADAKKUMCHERRYXI/39, KEYSTONE VILLA, VADAKKUMCHERRY HOUSE, VADAMA, MALA, THRISSUR.BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)SRI.V.P.NARAYANANSMT.DIVYA RAVINDRANSRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNANSMT.NISHA JOHN
RESPONDENT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL, AYAKAR BHAVAN, C.R. BUILDINGS, I.S. PRESS ROAD, COCHIN-682 018
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.02.2022, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA 112/2019
-2-
JUDGMENT
S.V.Bhatti,J.
Adv. Nisha John appearing for the appellant does notpress the prayers in the instant I.T. Appeal.
I.T. Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
Sd/-
BASANT BALAJIJUDGE
JS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.