Ita/113/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Late Smt. Hamida Begum Through Sh. Shehraj Khan
High Court
04 Jan 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Ita/113/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Late Smt. Hamida Begum Through Sh. Shehraj Khan
Date of order
04 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/113/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Late Smt. Hamida Begum Through Sh. Shehraj Khan, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the memo filed in the Court today, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
ON THE 4[th] DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE:
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH, A.C.J. AND
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.113 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Dehradun
.......Appellant (By Sri Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate)
AND :
Late Smt. Hamida Begum,
Through L/H Sh. Shehraj Khan,
14-A, Pathan Pura, Roorkee, District Haridwar
…....Respondent
(Counsel is absent)
This appeal coming on for hearing this day, Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath, A.C.J. delivered the following Order:
ORDER
Since Shri Hari Mohan Bhatia presently appears for the appellant-department, Registry to delete the name of the appellant’s counsel who was earlier appearing and show the name of Shri Hari
Mohan Bhatia as the counsel appearing for the
appellant.
2. In view of the memo filed in the Court today, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Pending application, if any, stands disposed off.
(Ravi Malimath, A.C.J.)
(Alok Kumar Verma, J.)
SK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue