Ita/113/2019 Of The Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
High Court
23 Sep 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/113/2019 Of The Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
Date of order
23 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/113/2019 Of The Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
104-3
CM-7328-CI[-2021 andCM-7332-C [1-202 1 iITA-113-2019(0&M)Decided on: 23.9.2021
The Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd.
....Appellant
VS)
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARINHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present:Mr. Rishab Singla, Advocate
for the applicant-appellant.
KK O
AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral)CMF7328;CllF2021
This application has been filed for placing on _ reco
Annexure A-9.
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same isallowed and document Annexure A-9 1s taken on record.
CMF7332;CllF2021
This is an application praying for withdrawal of the appeal as
the appellant is desirous of availing the benefit of the Scheme Vivad-se-
Vishwas Act, 2020.
Notice of the application.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Senior Standing Counsel appears and
CM-7328-CI[-2021 andCM-7332-C[[-2021 inITA-113-2019(0&M)
-)|
accepts notice of the application on behalf of the non-applicants/respondents and states that he has no objection if theapplication is allowed.
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same isallowed and the main case is taken up on Board today itself.
Main case
In view of the averments made in the application bearingCMF7332;CllF2021>the main case is dimissed as withdrawn with libertyto revive the appeal in case the Designated Authority does not accept thedeclaration filed by the appellant,
Since the main case has been decided, the pending civilmiscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of,
(AJAY TEWARITJUDGE
(ALKA SARIN)JUDGE
23.9. 720anuradha
Whether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether reportableYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue