Ita/116/2000 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S International Legguard
High Court
03 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/116/2000 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S International Legguard
Date of order
03 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/116/2000 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S International Legguard, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether speaking/reasoned?Yes/No2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
FSR S
ITA No.116 of 2000 (O&M)Date of Decision: 03.10.2018
FSR S
...Appellant
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar
VS|
M/s International Legguard Works|... Respondent|
KK O
Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Surya KantHon’ble Mr.Justice Sudip AhluwaliaHon’ble Mr.Justice Sudip Ahluwalia
FE SE
Present:Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate for the appellant |
Mr. Akshay Bhan, Sr.Advocate withMr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the respondentMr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the respondent
FE SE
SURYA KANT J. (Oral)
*+,Learned counsel for Revenue states that the tax effect involved|in this case is)<3,61,153/- and in view of the recent Circular No.3/2018|dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department ofRevenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, the tax effect being less than<50 lacs, he does not want to press this appeal on merits. —
*2,In view of the CBDT Circular, the instant appeal is dismissedas not pressed. As prayed for by learned counsel for the appellant, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to seek revival of the appeal, if need be, in thechanged circumstances. The question of law is also kept open. |
(Surya Kant)
Judge
03.10.2018(Sudip Ahluwalia)vishal shonkarJudge
1. Whether speaking/reasoned?Yes/No2. Whether reportable? |Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.