Case LawHigh Court › Ita/116/2011 Of Jose Cyriac v. The Deput...

Ita/116/2011 Of Jose Cyriac v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 09 Dec 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/116/2011 Of Jose Cyriac v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/116/2011 Of Jose Cyriac v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2011 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 I TA.No. 116 of 2011() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13/07/2011 IN MP 1/2010 IN IT(S&S)A 207/2005 IN ITSSA.207/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT /PETITIONER: -------------------- JOSE CYRIAC,42/2183,SRM ROADERNAKULAM, KOCHI-25 BY ADV. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: --------------- THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(3),ERNAKULAM BY STANDING COUNSEL, SRI. P.K. R. MENON THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2011, ALONG WITH ITA NO. 117 OF 2011 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT DT.28.3.2003ISSUED TO THE APPELLANTISSUED TO THE APPELLANT ANNEXURE B: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX(APPEALS)II, KOHI, DT.1.9.2005 ISSUED TO THEAPPELLANTINCOME TAX(APPEALS)II, KOHI, DT.1.9.2005 ISSUED TO THEAPPELLANT ANNEXURE C: TRUE COPY OF THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BY THEAPPELLANT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLAT TRIBUNAL,KOCHI BENCHAPPELLANT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLAT TRIBUNAL,KOCHI BENCH ANNEXURE D: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATETRIBUNAL, KOCH BECH DT.18.9.2005TRIBUNAL, KOCH BECH DT.18.9.2005 ANNEXURE E: TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFICATION FILED BY THE PETITINERBEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALBEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ANNEXURE F : TRUE COPY OF TH JUDGMENT DT.22.10.2010 ISSUED TO THEPETITINER IN ITA NO. 76/2010PETITINER IN ITA NO. 76/2010 ANNEXURE G: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 16.6.2007 ISSUED TO THEPETITIONER FROM THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALKOCHI BENCHPETITIONER FROM THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALKOCHI BENCH RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, &K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JJ ---------------------------------------------------- ITA Nos. 116 & 117 of 2011----------------------------------------------------Dated this the 9[th] day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J These appeals are filed against the orders of the Tribunaldismissing rectification application filed by the appellant forrectification of the orders of the Tribunal. However, it is seenthat the order of the tribunal sought to be rectified wasconfirmed by this court in judgment in ITA No.76/2010 andconnected cases. SLP filed against this judgment wasdismissed by the Supreme Court on 2.5.2011. Further reviewpetition No.733/2011 against the judgment in 76/2010 andconnected matters, of another Division Bench of this Courtwas also dismissed on 8.12.2011. Consequently,we dismissthese two appeals. Sd/-C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR(Judge) Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN (Judge) //true copy//
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan