Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1175/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1175/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trichur v. M/S.dharmaposhana Co., Irinjalakuda

High Court 13 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1175/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trichur v. M/S.dharmaposhana Co., Irinjalakuda
Date of order
13 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1175/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trichur v. M/S.dharmaposhana Co., Irinjalakuda, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: We therefore dismiss the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2009 / 22ND SRAVANA 1931 ITA.No. 1175 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.13/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- M/S. DHARMAPOSHNA CO., IRINJALAKUDA. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/08/2009, ALONG WITH ITA NO. 1187 OF 2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 1175 & 1187 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair,J. The questions raised pertain to department's claim of tax oninterest received from Indira Vikas Patras, Kissan Vikas Patras andKuri default interest under the Interest Tax Act. None of these is in thenature of loan or advance. While Kissan Vikas Patras and Indira VikasPatras are investments in Post Offices, interest received on kuri defaultis only default interest received. Since interest received in respect ofall these heads are not interest from loan or advance, the Tribunalrightly held against the department. We therefore dismiss the appeal. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. (C. K. ABDUL REHIM) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan