Ita/1177/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, Delhi v. Rajesh Kumar Kanodia
High Court
09 Apr 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/1177/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, Delhi v. Rajesh Kumar Kanodia
Date of order
09 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1177/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, Delhi v. Rajesh Kumar Kanodia, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~38
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1177/2018, C.M. Appl. No. 45397/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-14, DELHI
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Asheesh Jain, Advocate
versus
RAJESH KUMAR KANODIA
..... Respondent
Through: Presence not given
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R 09.04.2019
%
–It is submitted by the revenue which has preferred the present
appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, that it has preferred an application under Section 254 for rectification, which is pending before the ITAT. Accordingly, leave is sought for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to further approach this court for appropriate remedy, in respect of the order to be made (if adverse) by the ITAT as well as on the merit of the order impugned in the present case. The liberty is granted.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
APRIL 09, 2019 pkb
PRATEEK JALAN, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.