Case LawHigh Court › Ita/118/2002 Of M/S.kesav Cashew Company...

Ita/118/2002 Of M/S.kesav Cashew Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm

High Court 14 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/118/2002 Of M/S.kesav Cashew Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm
Date of order
14 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/118/2002 Of M/S.kesav Cashew Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Ongoing through the questions framed at the time of issue of notice, wefind the assessee apprehends that in view of the observations of theTribunal the addition will be sustained if the assessee does not proveit's case in terms of the observations of the Tribunal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 14TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 25TH MAGHA 1929 ITA.No. 118 of 2002() --------------------- ITA.18/COCH/1995 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT: ----------------- M/S.KESAV CASHEW COMPANY, EXPORTERS & IMPORTERS, KOLLAM-4, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SHRI K.YESODARAN. BY ADV. SRI.C.KOCHUNNY NAIR SRI.DALE P.KURIEN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/REVENUE ------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 118 OF 2002 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT C.N. Ramachandran Nair,J. This appeal is against the remand order of the Tribunal. Ongoing through the questions framed at the time of issue of notice, wefind the assessee apprehends that in view of the observations of theTribunal the addition will be sustained if the assessee does not proveit's case in terms of the observations of the Tribunal. However, we areof the view that the assessee will have a case only if the assessingofficer sustains the demand in fresh proceedings to be completed asdirected by the Tribunal. We therefore dismiss the appeal, but leavingopen to the assessee to raise all objections and with direction to theassessing officer to decide the matter afresh without treating theTribunal's observations as findings. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan