Case LawHigh Court › Ita/118/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/118/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.shaw Wallace

High Court 09 Oct 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/118/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.shaw Wallace
Date of order
09 Oct 2020
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/118/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.shaw Wallace, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the aforesaid submissions, the appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned counsel for the revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD I.T.A. NO.118 OF 2014 BETWEEN: 1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGS QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-12(3), BANGALORE. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADV.) AND: MR. SHAW WALLACE BREWERIES LTD., UB TOWERS, 6 FLOOR, 24 VITTAL MALLYA ROAD BANGALORE-560001 ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, ADV.) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 04-10-2013 PASSED IN ITA NO.825/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003-04, PRAYING TO: I. DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT. II. SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 04-10-2013 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH, BANGALORE, AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE PROCEEDINGS ITA NO.825/BANG/2012 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003-04. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for the revenue. Mr.T.Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the assessee. 2. Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the tax effect in this appeal is less than `1 Crore and therefore, the appeal may not be maintainable in view of the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the revenue submits that he be granted liberty to revive the appeal in case the matter falls within the exceptions under the aforesaid Circular dated 08.08.2019. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned counsel for the revenue. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE RV
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan