Ita/118/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Manjeri Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd
High Court
09 Feb 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/118/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Manjeri Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd
Date of order
09 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/118/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Manjeri Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 20TH MAGHA,1942
ITA.No.118 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 422/2017 DATED 13-06-2018 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
APPELLANT/S:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOZHIKODE.
RESPONDENT/S:
BY ADVS.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENTK.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
M/S. MANJERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDMANJERI, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 673 644.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR
R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEJITH
R1 BY ADV. SHRI.GOKULRAJ L.
R1 BY ADV. SMT. ARYA ANIL
R1 BY ADV. SHRI.VIPIN P.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON09.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
S.V.BHATTI.J.
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 9th day of February 2021
Memo dated 14.01.2021 filed by Sri.Christopher Abraham, learnedSenior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department to withdraw theappeal is ordered. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sri.Christopher Abraham draws our attention to the judgment ofthis Court in I.T.A. No.74 of 2016 dated 11.11.2019 and states that refundof proportionate court fee, taking into consideration the memo filed towithdraw the appeal etc., has been granted.
Refund of proportionate court fee is ordered. Hence the Registrymakes refund of court fee to the extent admissible in law.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMASJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.