Case LawHigh Court › Ita/119/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/119/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd

High Court 05 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/119/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd
Date of order
05 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/119/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR ITA No.119/2012 BETWEEN : 1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LTU, JSS TOWERS, BSK III STAGE, BANGALORE 2 THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-16(2) BANGALORE. APPELLANTS ( By Sri. K V ARAVIND, ADV.) AND : KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD, BANGALORE MAJOR WORK(S) DIVISION, ANANDA RAO CIRCLE,BANGALORE-560 009. ...RESPONDENT ITA is filed U/s.260-A of I.T Act, 1961 arising out of Order dated 11/01/2012 passed in ITA No.74/Bang/2011 by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore. This ITA coming on for admission this day, K SREEDHAR RAO, J, delivered the following: JUDGMENT The following substantial question of law raised in the memorandum of appeal is taken up for consideration: Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that the contract awarded by the assessee to 3[rd] party for erection, installation and execution of civil work of power lines and power stations was not composite contracts and no TDS was liable to be deducted in respect of payments made by the assessee to the contractors for purchase of materials involved in the said contract? This Court in ITA No.337/2011 (DD 15.3.2012) has answered the said question of law against the revenue. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-JUDGE bkm.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan