Ita/1195/2006 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Gokuldas Exports
High Court
06 Aug 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/1195/2006 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Gokuldas Exports
Date of order
06 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
1995-96
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/1195/2006 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Gokuldas Exports, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly the appeal is disposed of. od/- JIUDGEH od/- JIUDGEH
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATEKD THIS THE DAY OF AUGUST 2012
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SREBDHAR RAQ
ANT
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICBK B.MANOHAINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 1195/2006
BEBEIWEH
1.THR COMMISSIONBR OF INCOMBE-TACENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R. BUILDINGQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE
? THERE ASSISTANT COMMISISIONOF INCOMB TAXCIRCLE —- 11(2C.R. BUILDINGQUEENS ROADBANGALORE
(By Sri G KAMALADHAR, Adv.)
_. APPBLLANTS
AND:
M/S. GOKULDAS EXPORTSN./0, MISSION ROADBANGALOR
(By Sri. S PARTHASARATHY, Adv.)
... RESPONDENT
This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act,1961 arising out of order dated 21-04-2006 passedinM.P.NO. 29/bang/2006 in ITA No.1062/Bang/2004for the Assessment Year 1995-96, praying that thisHon'ble Court may be pleased to:
i. Formulate the substantial questions of law stated804+4,6%
1. allow the appeal and set aside the orders of theITAT, Bangalore bearing ITA No.10602/Bang/2004 dtd21-04-2006 and confirm the order of the AppellateCommissioner confirming the order passed by theAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-11(2),Bangalore.
li. to pass such other suitable orders as thisHon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts andcircumstances of the case in the interest of justice andequity.
This Appeal coming on for hearing, on this day,SREEDHAR RAO, J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This court in ITA No. 9964/2006 has set aside thorder of the Appellate Tribunal in question and thematter|1Sremanded.TO theTribunalfor.2+410consideration.
2.The impugned order in this appeal is themiscellaneous order connected with the order inchallenge in ITA No. 964/2006.
3.Since the main order has been set aside andremanded back for fresh consideration by the Tribunal,the appeal is unnecessary. The impugned order passedin the miscellaneous case shall be considered by theTribunal pursuant to the order of remand passed in ITANo. 9964/2006. Accordingly the appeal is disposed of.
od/-
JIUDGEH
od/-
JIUDGEH
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.