Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1197/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Ita/1197/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Central Iii v. Padmini Exports

High Court 10 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/1197/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Central Iii v. Padmini Exports
Date of order
10 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
1996-97
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/1197/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Central Iii v. Padmini Exports, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed on account of low tax effect.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~R-48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1197/2008 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI CENTRAL III .....Appellant Through: Mr Vipul Aggarwal, SSC, Mr Girban Naushad and Ms Sakshi Shairwal, JSCs. Versus PADMINI EXPORTS .....Respondent Through: CORAM:HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAO R D E R % 10.12.2024 1.The Revenue has filed the present appeal impugning the order dated 16.11.2007 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.985/Del/2004 for the assessment year 1996-97. 2.At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue states that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is below the threshold limit of ₹2,00,00,000/- as stipulated in the Circular dated 17.09.2024 and is not covered by any exceptions as set out in the circular. 3.Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed on account of low tax effect. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DECEMBER 10, 2024 M TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan