Ita/1/2016 Mcnally Sayaji Engineering Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolkata
High Court
29 Apr 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/1/2016 Mcnally Sayaji Engineering Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolkata
Date of order
29 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1/2016 Mcnally Sayaji Engineering Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolkata, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD – 50
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax]
ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/1/2016 MCNALLY SAYAJI ENGINEERING LIMITEDVS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA
BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ Date : 29[th] April, 2024
Appearance : Sri Smarajit Roy Chwodhury, Adv. ...for the respondent.
1.Case called out. None appears for the appellant to press the appeal. Sri Smarajit Roy Chwodhury, learned senior standing counsel for the respondent is present.
2.On earlier occasions, i.e. 20.12.2023 and 22.1.2024 when this case was listed, none appeared for the appellant to press the appeal.
3.Since the appellant is not appearing to press the appeal, therefore, we are left with no option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.
4.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. non-prosecution.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue