Ita/1/2016 Of V.e.siraj v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1)
High Court
29 Jan 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1/2016 Of V.e.siraj v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1)
Date of order
29 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1/2016 Of V.e.siraj v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1), the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: We, therefore, follow the afore-notedprecedent and dismiss this appeal accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN &
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/9TH MAGHA, 1937
ITA.No. 1 of 2016 ()
---------------------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 147/2015 of INCOME TAX APPELLATETRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 07-10-2015
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT:
--------------------------------------------
V.E.SIRAJ,
VALIYAVEETIL XL/4553, MARKET ROAD, KOCHI 682 003.
BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.R.SREEJITH KUM.SOUMYA PRAKASH SMT.O.A.NURIYA KUM.MEKHALA M.BENNY
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
--------------------------------------------------
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(1) RANGE-2, KOCHI.
R BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DG
ITA.No. 1 of 2016 ()
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE - A:COPY OF THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 DATED 27.12.2011 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT.ANNEXURE - B:COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) DATED 30.9.2014.
ANNEXURE - C:COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATETRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH DATED 7.10.2015.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS-NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANU SIVARAMAN, JJ.
------------------------------------------------------------------
I.T.A.No.1 of 2016
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 29[th] day of January, 2016J U D G M E N T
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.
The learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counselfor the Department submit that the issues raised in this caseare directly covered in favour of the Department as per thejudgment of this Court dated 3.7.2015 in ITA.No.278 of 2014.No other points raised. We, therefore, follow the afore-notedprecedent and dismiss this appeal accordingly.
Sd/-(THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE)
Sd/-(ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE)
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
DG
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.