Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1/2016 Of V.e.siraj v. The Income Ta...

Ita/1/2016 Of V.e.siraj v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1)

High Court 29 Jan 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1/2016 Of V.e.siraj v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1)
Date of order
29 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/1/2016 Of V.e.siraj v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1), the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: We, therefore, follow the afore-notedprecedent and dismiss this appeal accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/9TH MAGHA, 1937 ITA.No. 1 of 2016 () --------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 147/2015 of INCOME TAX APPELLATETRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 07-10-2015 APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT: -------------------------------------------- V.E.SIRAJ, VALIYAVEETIL XL/4553, MARKET ROAD, KOCHI 682 003. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.R.SREEJITH KUM.SOUMYA PRAKASH SMT.O.A.NURIYA KUM.MEKHALA M.BENNY RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------- THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(1) RANGE-2, KOCHI. R BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DG ITA.No. 1 of 2016 () APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE - A:COPY OF THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 DATED 27.12.2011 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT.ANNEXURE - B:COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) DATED 30.9.2014. ANNEXURE - C:COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATETRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH DATED 7.10.2015. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS-NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANU SIVARAMAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------------------ I.T.A.No.1 of 2016 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29[th] day of January, 2016J U D G M E N T Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. The learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counselfor the Department submit that the issues raised in this caseare directly covered in favour of the Department as per thejudgment of this Court dated 3.7.2015 in ITA.No.278 of 2014.No other points raised. We, therefore, follow the afore-notedprecedent and dismiss this appeal accordingly. Sd/-(THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) Sd/-(ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE) //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE DG
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan