Ita/120/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Kenton Leisure Services (P) Limited
High Court
14 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/120/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Kenton Leisure Services (P) Limited
Date of order
14 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/120/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Kenton Leisure Services (P) Limited, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
WEDNESDAY,THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 23RD KARTHIKA, 1940
ITA.No. 120 of 2012
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 171/2009 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH
APPELLANT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTRIVANDRUM
BY ADV. SRI PKR MENON SR FOR GOI TAXES SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/S:
M/S. KENTON LEISURE SERVICES (P) LIMITED
TCS EXECUTIVE HOSTEL, KAZHAKKOOTTAM, TRIVANDRUM-695582
BY ADVS.SMT.PREETHA S.NAIRSRI.K.JOHN MATHAISRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIARSRI.P.BENNY THOMASSRI.P.GOPINATH
OTHER PRESENT:
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The Standing Counsel for the Government of India (Taxes) submits thatthe Appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn in view of the litigation policy.Hence, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping the question of lawopen.
dkr
Sd/-K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGESd/-ASHOK MENONJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.