Ita/1/2023 Of Alankar v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax I
High Court
21 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Ita/1/2023 Of Alankar v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax I
Date of order
21 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1/2023 Of Alankar v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax I, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGHON THE 21[st] OF MARCH, 2023
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 1 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
ALANKAR THROUGH ITS PARTNER SHRI ASHISHKUMAR AGRAWAL, OCCUPATION : BUSINESS, R/O 55,MAIN ROAD, SADAR, JABALPUR (M.P.)
(BY SHRI SAPAN USRETHE - ADVOCATE)
.....APPELLANT
AND
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ITHROUGH CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING STATIONROAD, NAPIER TOWN, JABALPUR (M.P.)
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI MAYANK UPADHYAY ON BEHALF OF SHRI SIDDHARTHSHARMA - ADVOCATE)
This appeal coming on for admission this day, JUSTICE SHEEL
NAGU passed the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for appellant at the very outset informs that AssessingOfficer by order dated 14.03.2023 has accepted the return filed by the appellantand therefore learned counsel for appellant does not wish to press this appeal.
Registry is directed to take on record the assessment order dated14.03.2023.
In view of above submission of learned counsel for appellant, the appealstands dismissed as withdrawn.
YS
(SHEEL NAGU)JUDGE
(VIRENDER SINGH)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.