Case LawHigh Court › Ita/122/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/122/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kannur v. M/S. Dhanalakshmi Weaving Works, Kakkad

High Court 29 Mar 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/122/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kannur v. M/S. Dhanalakshmi Weaving Works, Kakkad
Date of order
29 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/122/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kannur v. M/S. Dhanalakshmi Weaving Works, Kakkad, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Since appeal is disposed of withoutnotice to the assessee, the assessing officer will serve a copy of thisjudgment on the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN MONDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2010 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1932 ITA.No. 122 of 2010() --------------------- ITA.801/COCH/2008 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT ------------------------- M/S.DHANALAKSHMI WEAVING WORKS, KAKKAD,KANNUR. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ALONG WITH ITA NO.124/2010 ON 29/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- I.T. A. Nos. 122 & 124 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Since the issue raised stands decided against assessee inassessee's own case by our earlier judgment in I.T.A. No.831 of 2009we do not think any purpose will be served by issuing notice to theassessee, except causing further loss to the assessee for engagingcounsel. Following the said judgment we allow the appeal by settingaside the order of the Tribunal and that of the first appellate authorityand restore the assessment. However, if any modification is requiredbased on the judgment, the same shall be done by the assessing officerafter issuing notice to the assessee. Since appeal is disposed of withoutnotice to the assessee, the assessing officer will serve a copy of thisjudgment on the assessee. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (P.S. GOPINATHAN) Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan