Ita/123/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 1, Chandigarh v. M/S. Clear 2 Pay India Pvt. Ltd
High Court
03 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/123/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 1, Chandigarh v. M/S. Clear 2 Pay India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
03 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/123/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 1, Chandigarh v. M/S. Clear 2 Pay India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.123 of 2019 (O&M)Date of decision : 03.10.2019
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh
VerTSU
..... Appellant
M/s Clear 2 Pay India Pvt. Ltd. (earlier known as ISTSInfotech Solutions Pvt. Ltd.) Now M/s FidelityIntormation Services India Pvt. Ltd.
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEKE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICHARNARESH SINGH GILL
,,,
Present :-Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate andMr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocatefor the appellant.
,,,
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
inLearned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that sincethe tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed inCircular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.l7 of 2019 datedOS.O08.2019 read with Letter No.E.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated20.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However,he prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein.
2 Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending C.M.Application, if any, also stands disposed of. |
(AJAY TEWARITJUDGE
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE
03.10.2019
pooja sharma-l
Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
Whether Reportable |
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.