Ita/124/2001 Of M/S.the Kerala State Civil Supplies v. The Commr. Of Incometax, Ernakulam
High Court
31 Jan 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/124/2001 Of M/S.the Kerala State Civil Supplies v. The Commr. Of Incometax, Ernakulam
Date of order
31 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
1983-84
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/124/2001 Of M/S.the Kerala State Civil Supplies v. The Commr. Of Incometax, Ernakulam, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal thereforefails and is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
THURSDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH MAGHA 1929
ITA.No. 124 of 2001()
---------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED MARCH, 2001 IN
ITA.944/1991 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT: ASSESSEE
-----------------
M/S. THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION (SUPPLY CO)
MAVELI BHAVAN, MAVELI ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR COCHIN 682 020 REPRESENTED
BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. P.K. MOHANTY.
BY ADV. SRI.C.KOCHUNNY NAIR
SRI.DALE P.KURIEN
RESPONDENTS:
-------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SR.COUNSEL FOR IT
SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 31/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 31st day of January, 2008
JUDGMENT
C.N. Ramachandran Nair,J.
The appeal is filed against Annexure C order of Income-taxAppellate Tribunal confirming disallowance of expenditure of Rs.79,92,182/- claimed by the assessee. We have heard counsel for theappellant and standing counsel for the respondent. We do not find anyquestion of law arising from the order of the Tribunal becausedisallowance is confirmed by appellate authorities at two levelsincluding the Tribunal for want of proof of having incurred theexpenditure claimed. The Tribunal has specifically stated that inspiteof sufficient opportunity given by the assessing officer, the assesseefailed to establish to have incurred expenditure during the accountingyear relevant for the assessment year 1983-84. The appeal thereforefails and is dismissed.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge.
(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.