Case LawHigh Court › Ita/124/2001 Of M/S.the Kerala State Civ...

Ita/124/2001 Of M/S.the Kerala State Civil Supplies v. The Commr. Of Incometax, Ernakulam

High Court 31 Jan 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/124/2001 Of M/S.the Kerala State Civil Supplies v. The Commr. Of Incometax, Ernakulam
Date of order
31 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
1983-84
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/124/2001 Of M/S.the Kerala State Civil Supplies v. The Commr. Of Incometax, Ernakulam, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal thereforefails and is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH MAGHA 1929 ITA.No. 124 of 2001() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED MARCH, 2001 IN ITA.944/1991 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT: ASSESSEE ----------------- M/S. THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION (SUPPLY CO) MAVELI BHAVAN, MAVELI ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR COCHIN 682 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. P.K. MOHANTY. BY ADV. SRI.C.KOCHUNNY NAIR SRI.DALE P.KURIEN RESPONDENTS: ------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SR.COUNSEL FOR IT SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT C.N. Ramachandran Nair,J. The appeal is filed against Annexure C order of Income-taxAppellate Tribunal confirming disallowance of expenditure of Rs.79,92,182/- claimed by the assessee. We have heard counsel for theappellant and standing counsel for the respondent. We do not find anyquestion of law arising from the order of the Tribunal becausedisallowance is confirmed by appellate authorities at two levelsincluding the Tribunal for want of proof of having incurred theexpenditure claimed. The Tribunal has specifically stated that inspiteof sufficient opportunity given by the assessing officer, the assesseefailed to establish to have incurred expenditure during the accountingyear relevant for the assessment year 1983-84. The appeal thereforefails and is dismissed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan