Case LawHigh Court › Ita/124/2023 Of The Pr. Commisisoner Of...

Ita/124/2023 Of The Pr. Commisisoner Of Income Tax v. M/S Vectra Advanced Engineering Pvt. Ltd

High Court 19 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/124/2023 Of The Pr. Commisisoner Of Income Tax v. M/S Vectra Advanced Engineering Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
19 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/124/2023 Of The Pr. Commisisoner Of Income Tax v. M/S Vectra Advanced Engineering Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signed byMALA K NLocation: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 124 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA BENGALURU-560 095 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(2), PRESENT ADDRESS, DCIT CIRCLE 7(1)(1), 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA BENGALURU 560 095 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. DILIP M., ADV.) AND: M/S VECTRA ADVANCED ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. VECTRA HOUSE, NO. 15, 1 MAIN ROAD, 6 CROSS, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 009. PAN: AABCV 1355K …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S. SHARATH, ADV. FOR SRI. TATA KRISHNA, ADV.) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO i. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Shri M. Dilip, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue submitted that these appeals are not maintainable in view of Circular No.17/2019 [F.NO.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ(PT.)], dated 08.08.2019, as the monetary effect is less than Rs.1 Crore. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 3. In view of dismissal of the appeal, I.A.No.2/2023 does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE PA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan