Ita/125/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Panchkula v. Rajwinder Kaur Mahal
High Court
03 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/125/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Panchkula v. Rajwinder Kaur Mahal
Date of order
03 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/125/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Panchkula v. Rajwinder Kaur Mahal, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA No.125 of 2016 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.125 of 2016 (O&M)Date of decision : 03.09.2019
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax,Panchkula
...... Appellant
VerTSU
Mrs. Rajwinder Kaur Mahal
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEKE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICHARNARESH SINGH GILL
...
Present :Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocatefor the appellant.
Mr. Manpreet S.Kanda, Advocate|for the respondent.
...
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
1]Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that sincethe tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed inCircular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.l7 of 2019 datedO08 O8.2019 read with Letter No.BF.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated20.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However,he prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein.
2 Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is,however,clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the appellant-revenueShall not be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits.
ITA No.125 of 2016 (O&M)
Further, the legal issue as claimed by the appellant-revenue is being leftopen to be adjudicated in an appropriate case.
3Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending C.M.Application, if any, also stands disposed of,
(AJAY TEWARITJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.