Ita/1269/2009 Of M/S.chorus Kuries & Loans (P) Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
18 Aug 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1269/2009 Of M/S.chorus Kuries & Loans (P) Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
18 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1269/2009 Of M/S.chorus Kuries & Loans (P) Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Since the question raised relates to part disallowance of the commission paid for canvassing subscribers for kuri andsince no substantial question arises from the order of theTribunal finding having rendered on facts we dismiss theseappeals filed by the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
TUESDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2009 / 27TH SRAVANA 1931
ITA.No. 1269 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.1171/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT: APPELLANT
-----------------------------
M/S.CHORUS KURIES & LOANS (P) LTD.,
THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E)
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
----------------------------------
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
CIRCLE-1, DIV.II,
THRISSUR.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 18/08/2009, ALONG WITH ITA.1270 OF 2009 THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................
I.T.A.Nos.1269 and 1270 of 2009....................................................................Dated this the 18[th] day of August, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since the question raised relates to part disallowance
of the commission paid for canvassing subscribers for kuri andsince no substantial question arises from the order of theTribunal finding having rendered on facts we dismiss theseappeals filed by the assessee.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue