Case LawHigh Court › Ita/128/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/128/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sasken Communication

High Court 03 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/128/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sasken Communication
Date of order
03 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/128/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sasken Communication, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 DAY OF JUNE, 2014 PRESENT THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE N. KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE B. MANOHAR I.T.A. Nos. 128 – 129/2014 BETWEEN : -------------- 1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (APPEALS) III C.R. BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE 560 001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 12(3) BANGALORE. … APPELLANTS (BY Sri. E.I. SANMATHI, ADV.) AND : ------- M/S. SASKEN COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES LTD., No. 139/25, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT RING ROAD, DOMLUR BANGALORE – 560 071 PAN AAECS 6424R. … RESPONDENT --- THESE I.T.As. ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961 TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11.10.2013 AND C.O. 72/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05. THESE APPAELS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, N. KUMAR, J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING; J U D G M E N T The revenue has preferred these appeals against the order passed by the Tribunal extending the benefit to the assessee. A perusal of the order impugned shows that the Tribunal has followed the judgment of this Court and granted relief to the assessee. As the aforesaid judgment of the High Court continues to hold good till date, we do not see any substantial question of law which arises for consideration in these appeals as the order passed by the Tribunal is in accordance with the judgment rendered by this Court. No merits. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE. Sd/- JUDGE. LRS.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan