Case Law › High Court › Ita/129/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/129/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Naresh Kumar Doshi

High Court 20 Aug 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_ind

Parties

Date of order

20 Aug 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ita/129/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Naresh Kumar Doshi, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: Since the monetary limit involved in this appealpertaining to Assessment period 2007-08 & 2008-09is less than Rs.50,00,000/-, in view of the CircularNo.03 of 2018, dated 11[th] July, 2018, issued under thesignature of Commissioner of Income Tax (AJ),C.B.D.T., Government of India, New Delhi, which is...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

pp/ 1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDOREIncome Tax Appeal No.129 of 2012 -Indore, Dated: 20/08/2018 Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned Counsel for theappellant. Heard on I.A. No.5989 of 2018. Since the monetary limit involved in this appealpertaining to Assessment period 2007-08 & 2008-09is less than Rs.50,00,000/-, in view of the CircularNo.03 of 2018, dated 11[th] July, 2018, issued under thesignature of Commissioner of Income Tax (AJ),C.B.D.T., Government of India, New Delhi, which isplaced on record, this appeal is disposed of leavingquestions of law open. Accordingly, I.A. No.5989 of 2018 stands disposed of. (P. K. Jaiswal) Judge (S. K. Awasthi) Judge Digitally signed by Pankaj Pandey Date: 2018.08.21 12:55:53 +05'30'

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.