Ita/1302/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Popular Automobiles, Kuttukaran Centre
High Court
24 Nov 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1302/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Popular Automobiles, Kuttukaran Centre
Date of order
24 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1302/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Popular Automobiles, Kuttukaran Centre, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: We do notfind any substantial question of law arising from the order of theTribunal wherein the deletion of additions made are only on facts.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1931
ITA.No. 1302 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.677/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT
--------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
POPULAR AUTOMOBILES,
KUTTUKARAN CENTRE, MAMANGALAM,
KOCHI.
BY ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 24/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
----------------------------------------
ITA. No.1302 OF 2009
----------------------------------------
Dated, the 24[th] day of November, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
On going through the Tribunal's order and after hearingthe Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant and counselappearing for the respondent, we find that all questions raisedpertain to additions deleted by the Tribunal mainly on the soleground of alleged undervaluation of stock transfer. We do notfind any substantial question of law arising from the order of theTribunal wherein the deletion of additions made are only on facts.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
JUDGE
V.K.MOHANAN,
JUDGE
kvm/-
V.K.MOHANAN, J.
O.P.No.
JUDGMENT
Dated:..
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.