Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1308/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of...

Ita/1308/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Modi Industries Ltd

High Court 26 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/1308/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Modi Industries Ltd
Date of order
26 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/1308/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Modi Industries Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1308/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus MODI INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 26.11.2018 Counsel for the appellant-Revenue submits that the tax effect in the present appeal is below Rs.50 lacs and hence, the substantial question of law raised in the present appeal need not be answered. The appeal may be disposed of leaving the question of law open. Taking the statement on record, we dispose of the present appeal without answering the substantial question of law, which is left open. We also give liberty to the appellant-Revenue to file an application for revival if the case is covered under an exception. SANJIV KHANNA, J. NOVEMBER 26, 2018 MR ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan