Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1314/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1314/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin v. Apollo Tyres Ltd.,Shanmugham Road,Kochi

High Court 17 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1314/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin v. Apollo Tyres Ltd.,Shanmugham Road,Kochi
Date of order
17 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/1314/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin v. Apollo Tyres Ltd.,Shanmugham Road,Kochi, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: However on going through the Tribunal'sorder, we find that the remand is made because the assessee was notgiven opportunity to reconcile the account by furnishing copies of theaccounts.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 26TH BHADRA 1931 ITA.No. 1314 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.379/COCH/1998 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT ----------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- APOLLO TYRES LTD., CHERUPUZHPAM BUILDING, SHANMUGHAM ROAD, KOCHI. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Appeal is filed by the department challenging the orders ofremand by the Tribunal. However on going through the Tribunal'sorder, we find that the remand is made because the assessee was notgiven opportunity to reconcile the account by furnishing copies of theaccounts. Department's grievance is repeated remand by the Tribunal.Of course as far as the Tribunal, being the final fact finding authority,can itself verify the records and grant relief instead of remanding thematter. However, since the Tribunal has not done so, we do not findany ground to interfere with the order of the Tribunal. Appeal isaccordingly dismissed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan