Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1315/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1315/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kottayam v. M/S.central Stores,Kottayam

High Court 17 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1315/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kottayam v. M/S.central Stores,Kottayam
Date of order
17 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1315/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kottayam v. M/S.central Stores,Kottayam, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Since the basis for penalty, that is additions, standscancelled, the Tribunal rightly confirmed the order of the CIT(Appeals) cancelling the penalty levied for concealment of income.Consequently we dismiss the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 26TH BHADRA 1931 ITA.No. 1315 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.44/COCH/1999 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT ----------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- M/S.CENTRAL STORES,KOTTAYAM. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Department is challenging the order of the Tribunal confirmingthe cancellation of penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the I.T.Act. However, it seen from the Tribunal's order that penalty iscancelled by the first appellate authority because in assessment appealthe decision was in favour of the assessee cancelling the additionsbased on which penalty is levied. It is conceded by standing counselthat department was unsuccessful in the assessment appeal before thisCourt also. Since the basis for penalty, that is additions, standscancelled, the Tribunal rightly confirmed the order of the CIT(Appeals) cancelling the penalty levied for concealment of income.Consequently we dismiss the appeal. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan