Case LawHigh Court › Ita/13/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/13/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bhandari Spinning Mills Ltd

High Court 01 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/13/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bhandari Spinning Mills Ltd
Date of order
01 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
2001-2002
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/13/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bhandari Spinning Mills Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: With the above observations, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1 DAY OF DECEMBER 2014. PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHARL.T.A. No.13/2009 BETWEEN: 1. The Commissioner of Income-Tax,C.R.Building, Queens Road,Bangalore. 2. Tne Income-Tax Officer,Ward -11(1), C.R.Building,Queens Road, Bangalore. APPELLANTS (By Sri.K.V.Aravind, Adv.) AND" M/s.Bhandari Spinning Mills Ltd.,.F-1, Mangalam Cnambers,K.R.Road, Bangalore.RESPONDENT (By Sri.S.Parthasarathi, Adv.) 7K OK This ITA is filed under section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961,|arising out of order dated 12.9.2008 passed in ITA.No.1109/| BNG/200/7, for the Assessment Year 2001-2002, praying toformulate the substantial questions of law stated therein andaliow the appeal and set aside the order passed by tne ITAT,Bangalore, in ITA No.1109/BNG/2007 at.12.9.2008 and confirmthe orders of the Income Tax Officer, Ward-11(1), Bangalore. This ITA coming on for Hearing this day,|N.KUMAR, J.,delivered the following: JUDGMENT The revenue has preferred this appeal against the orderpassed by the Tribunal granting relief to the assessee. | 2).The net tax which is the subject matter of this appealIS <9,23,/66/-. In view of the Instruction No.3/2011 whicn isheld to be retrospective in nature by this Court in the case ofCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME [AX & ANOTHER vs, RANKA & reported in|(2013) 352 ITR 121 (Kar.), this appeal is_not maintainable. | ‘3.However, it is submitted that the revenue haspreferred an appeal against the said judgment in the Hon’bleApex Court and it is pending consideration. In the event of revenue succeeding before the Hon’ble Apex Court, liberty isreserved to them to seek for revival of this appeal. At thisStage, the appeal is liable to be dismissed as not maintainable onthe ground of monetary limit. With the above observations, the appeal is dismissed. BSS. Sd/-|JUDGE. Sd/- | JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan