Case LawHigh Court › Ita/13/2022 Principal Commissioner Of In...

Ita/13/2022 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-1, Kolkata v. Shri Ratan Kumar Somani

High Court 08 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/13/2022 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-1, Kolkata v. Shri Ratan Kumar Somani
Date of order
08 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/13/2022 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-1, Kolkata v. Shri Ratan Kumar Somani, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect and the subsequent questions of law are left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/13/2022 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VS SHRI RATAN KUMAR SOMANI BEFORE : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM -A N D- HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA DATE : November 08, 2024. Appearance :Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. …for appellant Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. Jhunjhunwala, Adv. Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. …for respondent The Court :- This appeal has been filed challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. It is not in dispute that the tax effect involved in this appeal is much lesser than the threshold limit fixed by the C.B.D.T. Hence, the revenue cannot prosecute this appeal any further. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect and the subsequent questions of law are left open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE pkd/GH. (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan