Ita/132/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. Devinder Singh Gill
High Court
02 Mar 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/132/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. Devinder Singh Gill
Date of order
02 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/132/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. Devinder Singh Gill, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal stands dismissed aswithdrawn with above said liberty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
209 (4)IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.132 of 2019 (O&M)Date of decision : 02.03.2020
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2,Chandigarh,
...... Appellant
VeTSuU
Sh. Devinder Singh Gill
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEKE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICAVNEESH JHINGAN
...
Present :-.Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing counselfor the appellant.
None for the respondents.
...
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
inThis appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act’) against the orderof the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Divisional Bench, Chandigarhdated 24.8.2018 passed in stay application No. 43/Chd/2018 in ITA No,498/Chd/2015 annexed hereto as Annexure A-5.
2 Learned Senior Standing counsel states that the appeal hasbeen filed against the main order and consequently prays for permissionto withdraw this appeal with liberty to take all pleas in the appeal againstthe main order}
3Allowed as prayed for. Appeal stands dismissed aswithdrawn with above said liberty.
4Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, thepending application if any also stands disposed of.
( AJAY TEWARI )JUDGE
( AVNEESH JHINGAN )JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable ;
Yes/NoYes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue