Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1331/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Ita/1331/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Joseph Antony V, Cacha, 36/482

High Court 23 Dec 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1331/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Joseph Antony V, Cacha, 36/482
Date of order
23 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1331/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Joseph Antony V, Cacha, 36/482, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2009 / 2ND POUSHA 1931 ITA.No. 1331 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.365/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- SHRI.JOSEPH ANTONY V,, VACHA,36/482,ST.FRANCIS CHURCH ROAD,COCHIN-17. ADV. SRI.S.VIJAYAN NAYAR FOR R1 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE -------------------------------------------- I. T. A. No. 1331 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Even though the question raised in the Appeal by the Revenue onvaluation of bonus shares is a question of law, and the assessee'streatment of it's cost as Nil is prima facie not tenable, we notice that inthe next year, the assessee has declared full sale proceeds of bonusshares as income and paid tax thereon. Since subsequent year'sassessment has become final, we notice that revenue has no grievance.We therefore do not propose to go into the merits of the case.Accordingly appeal is closed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan