Ita/1331/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Joseph Antony V, Cacha, 36/482
High Court
23 Dec 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1331/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Joseph Antony V, Cacha, 36/482
Date of order
23 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1331/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Joseph Antony V, Cacha, 36/482, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2009 / 2ND POUSHA 1931
ITA.No. 1331 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.365/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------
SHRI.JOSEPH ANTONY V,,
VACHA,36/482,ST.FRANCIS CHURCH ROAD,COCHIN-17.
ADV. SRI.S.VIJAYAN NAYAR FOR R1
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
--------------------------------------------
I. T. A. No. 1331 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Even though the question raised in the Appeal by the Revenue onvaluation of bonus shares is a question of law, and the assessee'streatment of it's cost as Nil is prima facie not tenable, we notice that inthe next year, the assessee has declared full sale proceeds of bonusshares as income and paid tax thereon. Since subsequent year'sassessment has become final, we notice that revenue has no grievance.We therefore do not propose to go into the merits of the case.Accordingly appeal is closed.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(V.K. MOHANAN)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.