Ita/133/2010 Smt. Indra Jalan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata - X
High Court
28 Sep 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/133/2010 Smt. Indra Jalan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata - X
Date of order
28 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006, 2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/133/2010 Smt. Indra Jalan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata - X, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal fails and is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD-9
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/133/2010 SMT. INDRA JALAN VS. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA - X
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA Date : 28[th ]September, 2022
Appearance : Mr. Debasish Mitra, Adv. … for appellant Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. …for respondent
The Court : This appeal filed by the assessee filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directed against the order dated 13[th] April, 2010 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, Kolkata in ITA No.2177/Kol/2009 for the assessment year 2005-2006.
The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law :-
“Whether, on the admitted facts that the assessee had been following Mercantile System of Accounting at all material times, the interest of Rs.6,24,251/- accrued on loan advanced by her, on account of past years was liable to be taxed on receipt basis in the assessment year 2005-06?”
The short issue involved in the instant case is whether the assessee had been following mercantile system of accounting at all material times and the
interest accrued on loan advanced by her on account of the past years was liable to be taxed on receipt basis in the assessment year 2005-06.
We have carefully perused the assessment order as well as the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and that of the learned Tribunal and we find that a thorough analysis of the factual position had been undertaken not only by the CIT(A) as well as the Tribunal and the appeal of the appellant stood dismissed.
Thus, considering the order passed by the Tribunal, we find that the factual matrix has been correctly taken note of by the Tribunal and relief has been declined to the assessee and we find no grounds to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal.
Accordingly, the appeal fails and is dismissed.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA, J.)
S.Pal/SN/S.Das/A.S.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.