Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1338/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1338/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dhanalakshmi Weaving Works

High Court 09 Dec 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1338/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dhanalakshmi Weaving Works
Date of order
09 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/1338/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dhanalakshmi Weaving Works, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Since connected appeal is allowed vide judgmentdated 16.11.2009 in I.T.A.No.831/2009, which is for theassessment year 2001-2002, following the said judgmentwe allow this appeal also by reversing the order of theTribunal and by restoring the assessment confirmed infirst appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2009 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 ITA.No. 1338 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.696/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- DHANALAKSHMI WEAVING WORKS, KAKKAD, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ---------------------------------------- ITA. No.1338 OF 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated, the 9[th] December, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Since connected appeal is allowed vide judgmentdated 16.11.2009 in I.T.A.No.831/2009, which is for theassessment year 2001-2002, following the said judgmentwe allow this appeal also by reversing the order of theTribunal and by restoring the assessment confirmed infirst appeal. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE kvm/- V.K.MOHANAN, J. O.P.No. JUDGMENT Dated:..
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan