Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1340/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Ita/1340/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.gosris Hardwares, Cochin

High Court 24 Nov 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1340/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.gosris Hardwares, Cochin
Date of order
24 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/1340/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.gosris Hardwares, Cochin, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: We do not find any substantialquestion of law arising from the order of the Tribunal.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 ITA.No. 1340 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.370/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT ----------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- M/S.GOSRIS HARDWARES, KOCHI. ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ---------------------------------------- I.T.A. No.1340 OF 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated, the 24[th] Day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The question raised pertains to the addition deleted bythe first appellate authority which was sustained by the Tribunal.Lumpsum addition of Rs.50 lakhs was made based on roughProfit and Loss account prepared and kept by the assessee whichwas on 28.3.2006. However, the Tribunal found that assessewas maintaining full and complete accounts and therefore,addition is without any basis. We do not find any substantialquestion of law arising from the order of the Tribunal.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE kvm/- V.K.MOHANAN, J. O.P.No. JUDGMENT Dated:..
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan