Ita/1340/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.gosris Hardwares, Cochin
High Court
24 Nov 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1340/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.gosris Hardwares, Cochin
Date of order
24 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1340/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.gosris Hardwares, Cochin, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: We do not find any substantialquestion of law arising from the order of the Tribunal.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1931
ITA.No. 1340 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.370/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT
-----------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
M/S.GOSRIS HARDWARES,
KOCHI.
ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 24/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
----------------------------------------
I.T.A. No.1340 OF 2009
----------------------------------------
Dated, the 24[th] Day of November, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
The question raised pertains to the addition deleted bythe first appellate authority which was sustained by the Tribunal.Lumpsum addition of Rs.50 lakhs was made based on roughProfit and Loss account prepared and kept by the assessee whichwas on 28.3.2006. However, the Tribunal found that assessewas maintaining full and complete accounts and therefore,addition is without any basis. We do not find any substantialquestion of law arising from the order of the Tribunal.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE
V.K.MOHANAN,
JUDGE
kvm/-
V.K.MOHANAN, J.
O.P.No.
JUDGMENT
Dated:..
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.