Case LawHigh Court › Ita/134/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/134/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Cauvery Kalpatharu

High Court 30 Oct 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/134/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Cauvery Kalpatharu
Date of order
30 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/134/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Cauvery Kalpatharu, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal is accordingly|dismissed. | sd/- |JUDGE| od/-/ JUDGE|

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU DATED THIS THR 30 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015 PRESENT THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN| AND THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA| ITA NO.134/2015 BETWEEN: 1.THE COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TAXNO. 99/1, SHILPASHREE BUILDINGNO. 99/1, SHILPASHREE BUILDING VISHWEKESHWARANAGA MYSORE-570 OO8 «|THR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-1 (2), NO. 59/1CIRCLE-1 (2), NO. 59/1 SHILPASHREE BUILDING VISHWEKESHWARANAGA MYSORE-570 OO8 _. APPBLLANTS (By Sri. K V ARAVIND, ADV., ) AND: M/S CAUVERY KALPATHARU>(FRAMBBNA BANKCA 20, 2ND STAGE.VIJAYANAGAR, MYSORE-570 O08PAN: AAAAC4H322~ ... RESPONDENT This Income Tax Appeal is filed Under Sec.260-A ofIncome Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated:10/12/2014passed in ITA No.488/Bang/2014, for the Assessment Year|2010-2011 with a prayer to: 1. Formulate the substantial questions of law stated|above. ii. Allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by|the ITAT,|Bangalore1n ITA|No.4838/Bang/2014dated:10/12/2014 and confirm the order of the Appellate|Commissioner and confirm the order passed by the Deputy|Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Mysore. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, |VINEET SARAN J..DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard Sri K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for theappellants and perused the record. Oo.It is not disputed that the issue involved in thisappeal is squarely covered by the Division Bench decision ofthis Court rendered in-Karnataka Bank Ltd. -wvs-Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2013) 356 ITR|549, | 3.|Accordingly, for the reasons given in the|judgment in the case of)Karnataka Bank Ltd. (supra),WE.are of the opinion that no substantial question of law arisesfor determination by this Court. Appeal is accordingly|dismissed. | sd/- |JUDGE| od/-/ JUDGE|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan