Ita/134/2016 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. M/S Sundarlal Moolchand Jain Tobacconist Pvt. Ltd
High Court
16 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_ind
Parties
Ita/134/2016 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. M/S Sundarlal Moolchand Jain Tobacconist Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
16 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/134/2016 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. M/S Sundarlal Moolchand Jain Tobacconist Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHBENCH AT INDORE.I.T.A.No.134/2016
(Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-II V/s. M/s. SundarlalMoolchand Jain)
2
Indore, Dt.16.04.2018
Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for the appellant.
In this appeal the appellant/Department of Revenue haschallenged the order dated 02.05.2016 passed in ITANo.106/Ind/2016 and ITA No.107/Ind/2016, by which learnedTribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to verifywhether undervalued stock available with the assessees were soldduring the year under consideration and sale proceeds have beenrecorded in the books of account.
In pursuance to the direction made by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Indore, we granted time to the learned counselto verify whether the matter is still pending before the AssessingOfficer or not?
Today she has drawn our attention to the order passed bythe Assessing Officer on 05.05.2017 and submitted that the matterhas been decided by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle-5(1), Indore.
Considering the fact that reassessment has been completed,no further order in the present Appeal is required. In view of theaforesaid, the present Appeal is rendered infructuous. Accordingly,the same is hereby dismissed as rendered infructuous.
C.C. as per rules.
(P.K. Jaiswal)
Judge
ns
(S.K.Awasthi)
Judge
Digitally signed by Neeraj
Sarvate
Date: 2018.04.17 11:41:12 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.